Illegal Mexican Ana Gonzalez-Vargas arrested forgery, ID theft, of Elderly American Woman at Salem Oregon Nursing Hometwelve counts of Identity Theft, nine counts of Computer Crime, Theft In The First Degree, Forgery In The First Degree, three counts of Criminal Mistreatment

Mexican Suspect  Latina Ana Gonzalez-Vargas 24, arrested forgery, ID theft, of   Elderly American Woman at Salem  Oregon Nursing Home

Ana ,the illegal alien from Mexico, the lying Latina puta, opened up a checking acct for her anchor baby with the stolen money. Again, Hispanics, latinos mexicans, cannot be trusted to respect Americans at any level.

 They came here as criminals and they are criminals. The end justifies the means,for illegal aliens, and for the Race everything. 

 stealing from an old white woman is normal behavior for illegals from latin countries. 

A Black Latino from Venezuela, came to Oregon on a student visa for engineering, since he spoke only spanish, he dropped out and began drinking and whoring as an now illegal alien. He obtained a bank teller position at a local bank, and began pilfering funds from a deceased bank client. He was caught and used his anchor baby and family values, to convince the immigration judge he should be allowed to stay and guess what ! it worked!

Former Caregiver Arrested For Forgery and Theft From Elderly Client
Salem Police Dept. – 10/23/09

Ana Gonzalez-Vargas

Salem Police arrested a illegal alien from mexico Salem woman on multiple charges stemming from the theft and forgery of a check and identity theft from an elderly client for whom she was providing care.

The investigation began on September 3rd, when a relative of the elderly victim made a report to the Salem Police Department that one of her (the elderly victim’s) checks had been stolen from her property while staying at a care facility. The check was stolen sometime during the summer and had since been forged, and there had also been unauthorized charges against the victim’s bank account via checks that had been ordered illegally.

The victim also had credit cards in her belongings while at the facility, one of them belonging to her deceased husband. Although the credit cards were not physically taken, several charges were made on both charge card accounts totaling over $1,400.00.

Salem Police Lt Shawn Adams reviewed the initial report that was filed and spent several weeks diligently obtaining bank records and conducting follow up investigation into the case. As a result, a search warrant was served on the residence of the suspect on the morning of October 22nd in Salem. Upon serving the search warrant, officers encountered the suspect’s three children, all under the age of seven,( a real mexican breeder with three anchor brats) at the residence. The residence was in such condition that it was determined to be not safe for the children to remain there, and all three were taken into protective custody and released to the Department of Human Services.

Based on information and evidence collected in this case, it was determined that the suspect also opened a bank account in the name of her six-year old daughter using the personal information of the victim, then wrote several overdraft checks on that account. The total loss to the original victim was over $2,100.00 in thefts through on-line purchases and over $2,000.00 in forged checks.

The suspect, 24-year old Ana Gonzalez-Vargas, had been a caregiver to the victim at the care facility. She was taken into custody and charged with twelve counts of Identity Theft, nine counts of Computer Crime, Theft In The First Degree, Forgery In The First Degree, three counts of Criminal Mistreatment (based on the living conditions under which her children were living) and Endangering the Welfare of Minor. It was also learned that the suspect was in the process of gaining employment at a different care facility that also provides care for the elderly.

A photo of suspect Ana Gonzalez-Vargas is attached

Bumpoholics: New PC term to diguise skyrocketing birth rate in US due to Illegal aliens mexicans and anchor baby syndrome

http://www.tesh.com/ittrium/visit?path=A1xc797×1y1xa5×1x76y1×244fx1×9by1×2454x1y5×1c28cx5×1

goto the John Tess site and enter Bumpoholic.

This is an excellent example of where the Corporate, PC world  meets the Real World and tries to find a nice polite term devoid of race, nationality, diversity, or controversy to describe the corrupt use of the Anchor Baby Laws by illegal, third world women with wombs. Essentially bumpoholic means anchor baby syndrome, where women who are illegal tie anchor themselves to the cash cow or candy store called the USA and our welfare system .

 Last year the Birth rate in the US jumped to 4.3 million, the highest ever, and I bet most of them were by illegal mexicans and muslim immigrants and other State Department Trash.  So somehow a shrink in California , epicenter of the invasion, takes the rapacious exploitation of our country by mexicans etc, and describes it in terms of low self-esteem. They are having babies because  A. they are catholic or muslim trash ,uneducated and they brought with them a culture that values big families. They have the US taxpayer  paying for all those anchor babies. http://neutermexicans.com/The mexicans and muslims get 200.00 for food stamps per child. They get housing. they get medical , free schooling , WIC,and then they can also fight deportation using those kids. Everyone needs to go to Numbersusa and tell your Congressperson you want immigration stopped and no Amnesty for illegal aliens.Following is the first post that was flagged off of craigslist:

 

spay and neuter you mexican, H1-b visa overstay muslim refugee (population explosion due to 3rd world )

---

Date: 2009-09-22, 9:58PM PDT

Reply To This Post

---

 

http://stoptheinvasionoforegon.wordpress.com/2009/09/23/bumpoholicsillegal-meixcan-breeders-other3rd-world-female-trash-addicted-to-popping-out-babies/

bumpoholics breeders corrupt criminal thirdworlders who use the Us as thier candy store , rapacious greedy immigrants who wont deport , who rape stab and steal from the us citizens and it those of us who speak out who are punished
see south africa sucks for out future

• Location: population explosion due to 3rd world
• it’s NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests

PostingID: 1388013180

---

• Copyright

Stop Birthright Citizenship- No More Anchor Babies: Breeders go home

Anchor Babies: illegal immigration via the birth canal

 

 

By JOHN REINIERS

Special to Hernando Today

Published: January 25, 2008

 

About every six months the population of the U.S. increases about as much as the population of Tallahassee. Who are these hundreds of thousands of new citizens? They are newborns, children of illegal aliens born in the United States — birthright citizens, \”anchor babies\” — not illegal aliens.

This quirky legal right then allows the mother\’s parents and siblings to remain, and later a whole bunch of their relatives to immigrate legally.( see chain immigration at Numbersusa.com

 This why they are also known as “Jackpot babies.\“

Just consider Parkland Memorial Hospital in Dallas, the second busiest maternity ward in the U.S. In 2006, 70 percent of the women giving birth in Parkland were illegal immigrants.

That added up to 11,200 babies for which Medicaid kicked in $34.5 million to deliver these babies, the feds another $9.5 million and Dallas taxpayers tossed in $31.3 million.

 The average illegal patient is 25 years old and giving birth to her second anchor baby. We could also talk about California, but you get the point.
By law, illegal immigrants cannot be denied medical care based on their inability to pay or their immigration status. These women also receive free prenatal care, medication, car seats, bottles, diapers and formula.
The U.S. and a few other countries offer citizenship to anyone born on their soil. The United Kingdom and Australia abandoned this practice in the 1980\’s after being abused by immigrants for many years.
Why do we allow this to continue? The 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution reads:
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the states wherein they reside…
It was added to our Constitution right after the Civil War as part of a package of reforms to prevent any more injustices to African Americans, such as states denying citizenship to native born Blacks. The drafters of the\” Citizenship clause\” made it clear from their debate, that the clause \”subject to the jurisdiction thereof\” meant that the status of the parents of a child born within the territory of the U.S. determines whether of not that child is eligible for U.S. citizenship.
There have been surprisingly few Supreme Court opinions construing this clause — the results being a mixed bag of decisions. The lawyer in me wants to go into detail, but let me be mercifully brief:

 The latest case involved a terrorist who happened to be born in Louisiana, when his father, a native of Mecca, Saudi Arabia was working as an engineer for Exxon. He returned to Saudi Arabia as an infant, took up with al Qaeda as an adult, was captured during a battle in Afghanistan and wound up imprisoned in Guantanamo Bay.
The Supreme Court held that this Saudi, being Louisiana born, had a Due Process right as a citizen to challenge his detention as an enemy combatant. This ruling simply does not comport with any of the text or history surrounding the adoption of the Citizenship Clause. Just being born in the U.S. doesn\’t cut it, because such an interpretation renders the \”subject to the jurisdiction\” clause entirely redundant. It is a well settled doctrine of legal interpretation that legal texts — most certainly the Constitution — are not to be interpreted to make some words altogether redundant

. In other words why didn\’t the drafters just say, \”All persons born or naturalized in the United States …are citizens of the United States?\” (Imagine two terrorists — man and wife jihadis — slipping past border guards into a U.S. city to set up a terrorist cell. The wife then gives birth to a child. Should this budding young terrorist be an instant American citizen?)
Help could be on the way, but don\’t hold your breath. In 2007 Representative Nathan Deal, R-Ga., introduced H.R. 1940, The Birthright Citizenship Act of 2007, which would end automatic citizenship to babies born in the U.S. to illegal aliens. For those Americans who look to Europe — the cradle of our American civilization — for guidance,

Ireland, in 2004 voted to end automatic citizenship.

 That was the last member of the European Union to allow pregnant foreigners to gain residence and welfare benefits as a result of just being born there.
The political fallout of this bill could be enormous. Take California. Republican Governor Pete Wilson supported Proposition 187 in 1994 which was designed to deny illegal immigrants social services, such as welfare etc.

Latinos marched in protest; the issue wound up in the courts, was appealed, and Wilson\’s successor, a Democrat, abandoned the appeal. So it never became law. The media, social liberals and national Latino groups attacked Wilson — a highly successful governor, who got more votes than Ronald Reagan.

Well, that was the end of the Republican Party in California. And in 2008 California is even more Latino. (Just consider the multiplier effect of anchor babies.)
California Democrats still make snide remarks about Wilson\’s insensitivity towards Latinos. Interestingly, Hillary Clinton is courting Latinos in Nevada, just next door – even though they are in minority, but a growing slice of the voters — in order to influence California Latinos, the big enchilada.

It is estimated that about 1/3rd of California is already Latino, and they should be a majority by 2042.

 So the larger issue for the Dems is, if they get behind H.R.1940, it could hurt them in California. But as of this writing, Latinos and Californication has not yet overwhelmed the entire U.S., which they want to win in 2008.
Patriotism is when the love of your own people comes first. Politics, for Democrats, is thinking of the next election, and not what is best the next generation of Americans. With that in mind, illegal aliens and their progeny will continue to be one more group on the list of Democrat constituencies.

John Reiniers, a regular columnist for Hernando Today, lives in Spring Hill.